|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Director of AGROPALMA speaks to Planeta
Orgânico about Bio-diesel |
|
|
|
|
Marcello Brito is the Commercial Director of Agropalma and will
be giving a talk at the Expo Sustentat 2005 on the subject of
BIO-DIESEL. According to Marcello, "we are talking about a
market worth billions. Not only in liter terms, but also in
financial terms!" |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Marcello Brito (with crutches) receiving
President Lula
on his visit to the Agropalma Group’s farm |
|
In April 2005, Marcello Britto received several Government
authorities, including President Lula, for the inauguration of
the Agropalma Group’s bio-diesel plant. The fuel production unit
will use the palm fruit as raw material.
President Lula also visited the Agropalma Group’s farm, located
between the Municipalities of Moju and Tailândia, in the State
of Pará, to see plantations of palm (a species of palm tree
producing oil-bearing fruit) and the family farming project that
is being developed in a 600-hectare area. |
|
|
|
|
|
PO –
Could you start this interview by explaining what bio-diesel means? |
|
MB–
Bio-diesel is the result of a reaction brought about between a vegetable
or animal base, such as fat, butter, tallow or any vegetable oil, in the
presence of an alcohol – which may be methanol or ethanol (methanol
comes from gas, and ethanol from sugar cane, beetroot or corn) – in the
presence of a catalyst, causing a reaction. As final products there will
be an ester, which may be methylic ester if it is produced from
methanol, or ethylic ester if it is made from ethanol, plus glycerin.
This ester is the bio-diesel oil. |
|
|
|
PO – I
would like you to go a bit further and talk about bio-diesel as a fuel. |
|
MB–
In this case we will talk in chemical terms: it is the ethylic or
methylic ester, that is, that produced by the methylic or ethylic route.
Around the world, methylic type bio-diesel is the one that is most often
produced. In Brazil, we are working towards using the ethylic route
preferentially, although we are still producing it from methanol, as the
ethylic technology is not yet 100% mastered. But we will soon get there
and will have 100% sustainable bio-diesel. The alcohol to be used is
from a source that is 100% renewable, which is sugar cane, rather than
the gas that comes from oil extraction – methanol in Brazil – which is
not sustainable because it cannot be regenerated. |
|
|
|
PO –
Do you think that this change will take place in the short term? |
|
MB–
In our plant, we produce it by the two routes; but, for reasons of
cost, we are giving preference to methanol. The Brazilian tax
structure is complicated. As we are registered as a bio-diesel
producer and not as a fuel distributor, in order to buy ethylic
alcohol in the market, we have to buy alcohol for other purposes in
the fiscal classification. Because of that it costs us 30% more due
to taxes. Still in this same law, with relation to bio-diesel
production using ethanol, the final product will be bio-diesel plus
hydrated alcohol. However, we cannot sell this hydrated alcohol to
fuel distributors, we have to resell it to an alcohol plant. So,
someone had this “brilliant” idea: you purchase ethanol, take it to
your plant, use it in the process and later sell it back to the
alcohol plant in the hydrated form, adding logistics costs, taxes
etc. Logically, the result is not viable. This complaint has already
been made in Brasilia and at almost all events at which the national
bio-diesel program is discussed. The use of the ethylic route should
be the great differential for Brazilian bio-diesel abroad. The
attraction we want to present is a totally renewable bio-diesel oil
– both the fat part and the ethanol from sugar cane. |
|
|
|
PO –
How long did the research phase at Agropalma last until you reached
this point? |
MB
–
When we produce palm oil, during the refining process, in fact what
is used is a distillation column, in which, in the process,
everything that is known as “Off flavors” is removed, that is,
everything that imparts color, flavor and odor to any vegetable oil.
In the distillation process, these compounds are captured in the
form of fatty residues or simply fatty acids. We used to sell this
residue to the soap industry which produces a cheap kind of soap in
bars, with low added value. That spotty soap, very well known in the
North and Northeast. This is because the product has a very strong
odor and color.
It should be stressed that the oil-based chemical industry in Brazil
is still very incipient, that is, we would not have the advantage
the Asians have in selling their fatty acids to the industry in
general at much higher prices due to the absence of competing
products, such as tallow in this country. Brazil still imports about
80% of the oil-based chemical products it consumes. Therefore, in
Brazil, the price of fatty acid is fixed on average at 50% of the
value of tallow, because tallow is a much better raw material for
soap production.
The result is that tallow is very cheap in Brazil because the
country is a large meat exporter, the largest in the world.
Unfortunately, when you slaughter cattle, you produce beef plus
tallow. Tallow is very cheap and automatically fatty acid is also
very cheap. People who at first bought fatty acid as a substitute
for tallow lost interest, because there was sufficient tallow at a
low cost. |
|
|
|
PO-
You reached a dead end ... |
|
MB
– We had to find some solution to the problem. We could not continue
as before, we could not simply throw it away somewhere.
We started developing research in order to add value to that
product. A friend suggested we should talk to a chemistry professor,
Donato Aranda of UFRJ (the Rio de Janeiro Federal University). I
took 1kg of the product along to Rio de Janeiro. Our conversation
was excellent. The professor is an exceptional person! If Brazil had
more people like Donato, we would be in a much better situation... I
left the product with him. He made an assessment, studied it and,
after some months, sent a report to Agropalma suggesting some
alternatives, and one of them was to produce bio-diesel. That would
depend on how bold we wanted to be. He had the project for the
research. An innovation that did not exist anywhere else in the
world and that might work.
After a lot of talk, we decided to take on the financing of that
research. We signed a contract with the University and with the
Chemistry College. It was a contract with the University, not with
him personally. The result of that research was the development of a
new catalyst.
As you know, in order to produce bio-diesel, you need the oil, the
alcohol, and a catalyst to speed up the reaction. The catalyst
developed is solid and can be regenerated. This means that in our
bio-diesel production process, in which the raw material is fatty
acid rather than oil – thus, there is no glycerin to separate out –
esterification is used, so the only by-product we have is water. The
catalyst is re-used because we regenerate it.
|
|
|
|
|
PO – What year was that? |
|
MB
– All this started in 2001. The studies lasted 4 years. This
catalyst is produced from niobium, by CBMM in the town of Araxá,
Minas Gerais. That is, it is a catalyst made in Brazil. Until then,
the other catalysts were imported from Germany.. the United States.
So we had the catalyst ready, we had the process evaluated in a
pilot plant, and we then filed a patent application.
|
|
|
|
|
PO –
How did the negotiation between Agropalma and Professor Donato go? |
|
MB
– The patent belongs to the Rio de Janeiro Federal University. The
exclusive usage right is ours for as long as the patent is valid.
We, as a private enterprise, do not want to own the patent, we want
the right to use it, but to the University it is very important. We
arranged things that way and pay royalties to the University. Every
six months for the next twenty years, we will be paying royalties to
the University, and all those who took part in the project will
benefit from it. |
|
|
|
|
PO – It is an fantastic story!... What was the next move?
|
|
MB -
Well, when this part was concluded, we started to think about a way
in which to make it viable, change it into an engineering project,
considering it is a new technology that is not produced anywhere. We
contacted several companies and liked the package offered by Dedini,
which already has a lot of experience with alcohol as a bio-fuel.
The greatest difficulty was that the company that agreed to develop
the engineering project would have to sign a contract with Agropalma
accepting our intellectual rights over the project. The company
could not sell the plant in question to others without our
authorization, because the development of the technology was ours.
|
|
After negotiations, Dedini accepted this and put together a
fantastic engineering package. An efficient, compact, low-cost plant
was created. There is no open market for bio-diesel yet; nobody in
his right mind will invest 10 to 15 million euros (that is the price
for a normal bio-diesel plant in Europe). In Brazil, it’s got to be
a cheaper business. Therefore, the whole project was drawn up so
that it was a feasible investment for us. And Dedini presented a
project that cost less than 2 million dollars; the project is fully
computerized, with every safety item you can imagine.
From the screen of a PC you can control the whole plant, producing a
bio-diesel fuel that meets 100% of the European and US
specifications. |
|

|
|
Agropalma’s
bio-diesel plant |
|
|
|
|
|
PO- That means you are able to export bio-diesel. |
|
MB
– Some months ago we were giving a talk on bio-diesel at the
Brazil-Germany Chamber of Commerce. The last slide we showed was a
comparison of the results of palm-diesel (that is what we call our
bio-diesel) with the European and Brazilian norms. We are better
than required in every item of the European norm, which qualifies us
to sell this product abroad. In short: you have a renewable basic
source – the plantation. From this plantation you extract the oil,
which is then refined for the food industry; and from what is left
over from the oil, you produce fuel which returns to the farm in
order to fuel the equipment – and so, the cycle is closed. It was a
sensational project carried out by UFRJ, the team’s professional
posture was so positive that we already have other researches under
way. |
|
|
|
|
PO –
You posed a challenge to them and they gave a brilliant response. |
|
MB –
They were very good and in addition, brought us new ideas. These
ideas are the most extraordinary you could imagine. If one day
someone asks us for organic bio-diesel, even that we are capable of
supplying, since we produce organic oil. We would take this oil and
first extract the glycerin from it. No one does that today because
when you first extract the glycerin, what is left is fatty acid. In
the near future, we’ll be able to extract organic glycerin – the
only one in existence in the world – and the 90% of fatty acids will
be changed into bio-diesel. A highly sustainable type of bio-diesel.
It would be 100% sustainable, with a very large organic base (about
80% of organic raw material). |
|
|
|
|
PO –
Another novelty for the organic sector in 2005? |
|
MB
–
We won’t produce that yet, but the project is already ready. Next
year, we should be producing organic glycerin. We checked the
market, with 2 companies: a German and a US company. They both
accept it but they want the exclusive right to purchase the product.
It would be the only organic glycerin for the cosmetics industry.
What happens to normal bio-diesel? When you produce it you produce a
lot of glycerin, how much of that glycerin will the market manage to
absorb? Prices have fallen drastically, especially in Europe, which
used to be an importer of glycerin long ago, but today is also an
exporter. For that reason, we will produce a differentiated
glycerin. |
|
|
|
|
PO –
What is the impact of bio-diesel on the Brazilian economy? |
|
MB–
The main problem for bio-diesel is the cost that still exists. As we
are only just starting, we do not have scale production. All you
have to do is to remember what it was like in the case of alcohol.
At first, alcohol cost more than gasoline. The same is the case
today with bio-diesel. When you do not have scale production, you
have very high costs. At present, in a competitive market, it is
very difficult to offer to a company like Petrobrás, Ipiranga,
Texaco etc. a marvelous product, which is sustainable and ecological
but which costs 70% more than ordinary diesel oil. |
|
|
|
|
PO –
And we still have to tell the consumer what bio-diesel is. |
MB –
The Brazilian consumer is not prepared to pay this amount. You have
to start looking for other sources in order to gain scale. In order
to take the diesel oil that generates electric power to certain
locations in the Amazon region, the cost of 1 liter can be
equivalent to as much as 3 liters. That is, you spend the cost of 3
liters of diesel in order to take 1 liter of diesel to that region,
because of the distance and logistics. Everybody deserves to have
electric power.
That would be a clever way. To have regional bio-diesel production,
with logistics costs dropping considerably. We should remember that
it is the consumer who pays for that. Within the price of diesel oil
bought in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo or anywhere else
in Brazil, there is an additional amount that subsidizes the diesel
which goes from one region to another. |
|
|
|
|
PO –
How do you see the relation between bio-diesel and family farming?
|
|
MB
–
If we create a bio-diesel program focusing only on family farming,
nothing will be achieved. If we create a bio-diesel program focusing
only on energy, we may achieve nothing either, because the world is
not going through an energy crisis, despite the price of petroleum.
Brazil is practically self-sufficient. It is not like the time when
they started producing alcohol as a fuel, because then we were going
through an energy crisis. We have to achieve a balance, knowing that
a program the size of the Brazilian bio-diesel program cannot be
created on the basis of family farm production. One can start well
from there.
|
| |
|
|
The government wants to implement bio-diesel based on castor oil
in the North-east, but there are some technical restrictions.
You will probably not be able to mix over 5% of castor-based
bio-diesel into ordinary diesel oil. This is still very
controversial. Castor-based bio-diesel fulfills neither European
nor US norms and is very expensive. |

|
|
|
|
|
We
do not know who will subsidize this. You will start from a very
expensive raw material in order to produce a cheap product. You can
start that way at these 2%, but with the demand growing you will
have to resort to soy and to palm in the Northern region. Because
these are the two that will bring scale to production. Palm will
bring scale, thanks to its high productivity per hectare, from 4,000
to 5,000 kg of oil per year. Soy oil productivity corresponds to
that of castor, which is about 500 to 600 kg, but the volume of soy
you have is huge and Brazil masters the whole cycle, contrary to
castor of which we know very little. In order to gain scale and
reach beyond these 2%, if we do not invest in soy and palm the
program will die. We have to take advantage of this niche, this
start, in order to make this investment in the North-east. Now,
again, we need to know who will subsidize this program, because even
if the family farmer is exempt from the PIS and COFINS
contributions, according to the program, the cost will not be
viable. |
|
|
|
|
PO –
Is Agropalma very involved with the family farmer? |
|
MB
– It is different in our case. As a private enterprise, our main
focus is not to provide social benefits. It is the government that
does that, with the taxes paid by the private sector and the
taxpayer. If a private enterprise invests in partnerships involving
family agriculture, it is because the program is good and is
working, we make money and so does our partner. You manage to bring
development to a certain region with reduced expenditure on the part
of the participants involved in a project.
At present, with these projects, a private enterprise can expand its
production area without investing capital in land, without
increasing personnel. (In our case, the total cost of charges and
benefits is almost 102% of the salary we pay.) The farmer also gains
because he can produce safely, knowing that what he produces will
generate income, with guaranteed sale, technical assistance and
improved income. The government will have to intervene less in the
regions where these programs go ahead, reducing expenditure on
minimum income programs, basic food packages etc.
In life, everything that becomes rare attracts interest. The only
preserved forest in existence in our region is Agropalma’s, and if
we are not careful it will soon become the target of illegal
wood-cutters’ or squatters’ greed; so we decided to carry out a
pilot plan with 50 family farmers in the region. Each family would
receive 10 hectares and the project was divided that way. The State
government supplied the land, Agropalma contributed with the
production of seedlings - which take from 15 to 18 months to reach
the planting stage – the initial infrastructure, assistance with
technical training, first application of fertilizer, and guaranteed
purchase of the produce. The price is calculated as a percentage of
the value of the unprocessed oil in the European market. An exchange
market that works without any interference on our part. The problem
is that the palm takes from 3 to 4 years to start producing.
|
|
|
|
|
PO –
How are these farmers going to live until they start producing? |
|
MB
– Hold on a minute ... That is where Banco da Amazônia, another
partner, came in and provided financing for the farmers. They pay a
minimum salary a month to each of these 50 families. Mind you, it is
not a donation, but finance. The last partner is the Town Hall,
which is responsible for selecting the families and for hiring a
permanent agronomist. When they start producing and Agropalma starts
to pay them for the bunches of fruit, part of this payment will be
retained and deposited in a savings account in Banco da Amazônia in
the name of the producer, who will not be able to touch that money.
When the grace period is over, this money will be used to repay the
financing of this minimum salary and the raw materials he received
during those 4 years. |
|
|
|
|
PO –
A great partnership ... |
|
MB-
You have private enterprise, the state, federal and municipal
governments all involved. All of them with their respective
responsibilities, rights and duties under a signed contract. The
producers were brought together to form an association. This was a
pilot plan for 50. In the following year, we settled over 50
families, and last year another 50. We already have 1,500 hectares.
The first families to be settled took such care of the plantation
that production started early, almost a year before we expected.
|
|
|
|
|
PO –
When do they start receiving their salaries? |
|
MB
– They have already started receiving them this year. What they
received in the first 3 months of the year amounted to an average of
R$800.00 each. Don’t forget that the average income in this region
does not go beyond R$65.00 a month. There is no family farming
program in the Northern region of Brazil that pays even half of that
amount.
Don’t forget either that it is a permanent job because it is a
perennial plantation, that is, it will be producing there for the
next 30 years. So, for the next 30 years that person will have a
job. As it is a type of plantation that does not require daily
cultivation; and you can divide this area, let’s say that not all
the 10 hectares are planted with palm, but 6 hectares of palm and 4
hectares of any other plantation, or fruit growing compatible with
the soil, so that the farmer may have, from his own direct labor,
subsistence farming as a supplement and not as an end in itself.
We are negotiating this project with the MDA (Ministry for Agrarian
Development) but the bureaucratic barriers are very high. Around
Agropalma alone we have over 1,000 families settled by the INCRA,
most of them in very bad conditions. This is a break with the
accepted model. |
|
|
|
|
PO -
Why? |
|
MB
– Because it is said that extensive sustainable plantations are not
viable in Brazil.
The
proof that such a task is feasible is what we see at Agropalma. If
we have corresponding support it is possible to carry out a big
project involving family farmers. A big differential that producers
in Europe, in the US and Canada have is knowing that they can
produce because they will have assured income due to the subsidies
offered.
If
you make a settlement today, in Brazil, with producers planting
rice, beans, corn or something else, if there is a crop failure they
will have no-one to sell to nor anything to resort to. In our
project, there is a strong company backing the farmers, and prepared
to face the usual market tribulations.
In
the State of Pará, they organized the planting of manioc for the
production of starch. However, the industry was not built. The
manioc is ready for the harvest. What now? What will they do with
the manioc? |
|
|
|
PO –
That’s why it’s necessary to match supply with demand.
|
|
MB
– As the governor of Pará said on the day our bio-diesel plant was
inaugurated, Pará is showing a self-sustaining type of agrarian
reform. It recovers a degraded area. You will never make a
settlement in a forest area, because there are plenty of degraded
areas. In the case of palm plantations, you are able to return to
the soil, in terms of biomass, something like 35 tons per hectare
per year. This is more biomass than any natural forest produces.
Naturally, it does not have the biodiversity a forest has. You bring
in an enterprise that creates green cover, inhibits leaching and
erosion and protects the soil, bringing social and economic
development. Agropalma’s project is open to visitation. We have
visitors every week. We recently received a mission from the Thai
government. We also had visitors from Codevasf – from the São
Francisco River Valley in the State of Pernambuco – coming to learn
more about this model and see if it can be adapted to the São
Francisco River Basin. |
|
|
|
PO –
Can this model be adapted to other regions?
|
|
MB
– It can be adapted to a series of other crops. The thing is to
break with tradition. Those involved with family farming should put
ideology aside and have a nationwide project. That is, let us
suppose that someone produces, someone buys and someone sells. It is
a mistake to say that family farming cannot be connected with a
company. On the contrary, it should be connected with a small,
medium or large company.
Malaysia’s agricultural project was self supporting and grew. A
country the size of the State of São Paulo – and it has more than 10
farm products of which Malaysia is among the 3 largest producers in
the world. Precisely because of that, the whole agricultural part
was carried out in conjunction with the industrial part. The
industrial part, which adds value and sells.
We had
a meeting where we were asked: What are the financing plans for
bio-diesel?
Banco do Brasil has a credit line for the rural production of
oil-bearing plants, aiming at bio-diesel. The people at the
BNDES have a credit line for the construction of factories. What we
need to know now is who will buy this product. Because today you
will produce at a much higher cost than what the market is paying.
Who will buy? What is the other side to this process? |
|
|
|
PO
– How do you see the market
for bio-diesel? |
|
MB
– I think it is a fantastic market. It is already a reality in
Europe. There are some cases of interference that have to be
evaluated: there is a huge subsidy in this sector. In Germany, but
the subsidy will end in 2009. That is when we will see the final
picture. When you follow the bio-diesel production cycle in Europe
today, you see France doing the opposite of Germany. While Germany
is a closed market (they cannot import bio-diesel), we see French
investment in this area, including in Brazil, for future exports. |
|
|
|
PO –
Isn’t there a risk of a “bio-diesel fever?” |
MB
–
As people talk a lot about bio-diesel, everyone thinks it is easy
to produce. Everyone wants to plant castor, palm, etc. Technically,
it may even be considered easy to produce bio-diesel. But to produce
bio-diesel within market specifications is very difficult and very
expensive. Because it is not only the industry. You need to have the
equipment for control and analysis and you must have the right
logistics, which is not the same as for ordinary diesel oil. It is
not simple.
We
have been invited to seminars by people who want to open a business
for bio-diesel production. There are even municipalities getting
together to collect used frying oil in order to produce bio-diesel.
What we are talking about is a 2 billion liter per year market, and
people want to produce bio-diesel from collected oil? That is a very
attractive project to be carried out by a company, labor
cooperatives or even municipalities, if the collection is carried
out in a town and if they have a partnership with a bio-diesel
producer that can transform this oil and use it, for example, in the
town’s own fleet. That would be a viable, sustainable program. |
|
|
|
PO –
You talked about the Amazon region, how do you see these
declarations that have been published in the media, such as Pascal
Lamy’s, for example, about the internationalization of the Amazon? |
|
MB
– If people are talking about that is because we gave them the
opportunity for such talk. We are sufficiently incompetent to let
all this happen. If we analyze the way in which investments were
made in the Amazon, ever since the first development plan, the
SPVEA, around the fifties, they all failed. One way or another, they
were all radical.
If we take the SUDAM (Amazon Development Superintendency) plan, at
the time of the seventies and eighties, we see that it was an absurd
plan, because the government gave subsidies for people and companies
to clear as much as possible of the forest. At that time, as there
was no ecological thinking, they all went to the Amazon region, both
national and international companies. The concept at that time was
different. Until there came a time when people realized that model
would not work. Those who invested in something that could be
sustainable, remained there. Those who didn’t, left. All you have to
do is to look at the investments that were made there and see how
many remained. Even today there is no adequate control in the Amazon
region because the main economic activities related to the forest
are in the hands of politicians or people who are connected with
them in some way. |
|
|
|
PO –
Isn’t there any government initiative to establish control? Could
you explain a little more about Provisional Measure 2166? |
MB
– P.M. 2166 is the 80/20 law. The Amazon region is so important to
Brazil that a provisional measure that affects an area that is over
50% of the Brazilian territory has continued as a provisional
measure since 1999. It has not been discussed since then, at least
the way it should be. If it was considered important it would have
been discussed. But no one wants to take on that responsibility.
It
so happens that the laws for the Amazon region started to be
improved during the Sarney administration, when he took away the
subsidies for deforestation. That was an important measure. In 1999,
the 80/20 law was created. Do you know any private enterprise
interested in getting to a forest area and clearing 80% of the trees
in order to plant? You won’t find one because the company would not
sell this product anywhere. The concept today is different. Whether
you are a conscientious entrepreneur or not, the pressures, whether
national or international, are growing – especially on the part of
clients – and no one, that is, no serious-minded person, wishes to
clear the forest any more.
On the other hand, if you have an area that was cleared years and
years ago, and that has been abandoned, that does not produce any
kind of wealth nor income and has zero environmental value, and if
you wish to invest in that area, the law says that you can use 20%
of that land, the other 80% must be re-forested, on the
entrepreneur’s own account and risk, and he also has to pay taxes on
100% of that area. For example, if any one invades that area, and
fells the forest you yourself planted, you
are judicially penalized, you will be arrested.
Because, according to the law, you are obliged to protect that land,
which should be the government’s responsibility as you cannot invest
in such land. They have created a law in Brazil that says: “For the
benefit of the world community, all those who own land in the
Brazilian Amazon region will have to give up 80% of their land
without anything in return”. Brazil says that we will take 80% of
the Brazilian Amazon region and donate that area for the well-being
of the international community, forgetting that we have over 20
million people living in that region, and who, like any other
citizen of the world, also want and deserve to aim for the comfort
of a better and more dignified life. |
|
|
|
PO
- What is the solution? |
|
MB
– The thing is, you have the opposing camps: radical
environmentalists who forget about external economic factors, and
radical economists who forget about external environmental factors,
and so, things don’t move. The happy medium does exist and has to be
put into practice. The government must fulfill its obligation to
legislate.
|
|
|
|
PO –
And what about the extractive activity? |
MB –
The
extractive activity is excellent in order to feed 50 families, but
not for the number of people who live in the Amazon region.
In fact, it is necessary to have balance, and understand that as you
develop the region in a sustainable way you are inhibiting
depredation. When destruction is illegal, then it is a case for the
police. We have the SIVAN system, we have satellites over the
Amazon, in short, we have every resource needed to control the
destruction. What is missing is the political will. |

|
|
|
|
PO –
With all this international pressure, aren’t you afraid that it may
come to a point where this negative image of deforestation affects
products coming from the Amazon region? |
MB
– Exactly. And that is why we have to break with tradition. We must
have a law, a social, economical and environmental development
policy, that shows that it can be different. Agropalma is proof of
that. We are in the middle of the Amazon region, inside a poor
region, producing wealth in a sustainable way.
Did
we make any mistake in the past? Of course we did. Everybody did.
Wrong for today’s way of thinking. It wasn’t in the past. The human
being’s great advantage in any business is that you can adapt to the
needs of the time in which you live. Our need today is
sustainability, and we are showing that it is feasible. We invite
you to visit us to learn about the structure and see what is taking
place, talk to the people employed, and see the number of
micro-entrepreneurs that have already arisen in the region. We then
travel about 30 km in order to see the local situation in the
surrounding areas, and we will see a lot of poverty – extreme
poverty – ignorance, illiteracy and high infant mortality rates.
We have been producing in very large quantities because we have
sunshine, the right climate, water the whole year round. On the one
hand, we celebrate the success of our agricultural industry, but on
the other, we are criticized sometimes without any foundation.
People say that the State of Mato Grosso is the largest agent for
the destruction of the Amazon forest. If I’m not mistaken, the State
of Mato Grosso has 90 million hectares and has 2 or 3 or even 6
million hectares of soy plantations – that is, less than 10% of its
area. So the truth is relative. It depends on the way it is shown.
The media exploit the subject according to their own interests. |
|
|
|
PO –
What’s your view of the issue of carbon credits in relation to this
reforestation? |
MB-
In this respect, the forests validated in carbon sequestration plans
are those planted after the year 2000. This is a point that is
favorable to the Brazilian government, the big project that we have
to do, it’s a big
reforestation program in the degraded areas, in which, in addition
to the ecological and economic gain from the fruits of this
production, there will be the gain from carbon sequestration. The
amount of planted forests in Brazil is still very small.
So carbon sequestration is another opportunity for Brazil to do
something potentially big in environmental terms. If we take our
industrial emissions, added to the burning of forest and brush for
clearing purposes and other things, Brazil would not be a
beneficiary. We are only benefiting now because we are still
considered a developing country. This is the moment. We have to take
advantage now. We should add things up, we should add carbon
sequestration with the use of bio-diesel to substitute fossil or
renewable fuels. It is an additional gain |
|
|
|
PO-
Do you consider this a strategic moment for Brazil? |
|
MB
– All of this is a matter of “strategic intelligence”. What was
missing in Brazil in the past, and what is encouraging all this
destruction in the Amazon region, was the lack of strategic
intelligence. Brazil is suffering. If nothing is done and we leave
things the way they are, it will be another generation that’s
wasted. All perennial plantations are long-term, and by time you
raise seedlings, plant them and wait till they reach maturity,
another 10, 12 years have gone by. Each government that takes
office and does nothing, lets things go on the same way, is in fact
helping to make matters worse. During the second mandate of the last
government, when the 80/20 Law was passed, in 99, nothing was done.
During the present administration also, nothing has been discussed
in this respect. If they have the intelligence to transform what
does harm into a beneficial project, that would be ideal. Leaving
things as they are is complicated, and creating a whole lot of
forest reserves just to bow to international pressure, doesn’t help
at all. You create a reserve but you don’t create the means of
sustaining it. |
|
|
|
PO –
You said that there’s an enormous market for bio-diesel. What size
is it? |
|
MB
– Brazil’s present program says 2% of bio-diesel is to be added to
ordinary diesel oil. From 2008 on it will be compulsory – for the
time being it’s voluntary. After it becomes compulsory, we’re
dealing with a market that will have to produce about 1 billion
liters per year. If we place it at R$1.40 per liter, you can see
that it’s a considerable market. And that’s with just 2%.When it
becomes compulsory to use 5%, it will be even bigger. That’s with
regard to Brazil. In Europe, in 2008 it will become compulsory to
use 5.75% of bio-diesel in ordinary diesel oil. So we’re
talking about a market worth billions. Not just in liter terms, but
in financial terms! |
|
|
|