Click here for other visits


Director of AGROPALMA speaks to Planeta
Orgânico about Bio-diesel

 
Marcello Brito is the Commercial Director of Agropalma and will be giving a talk at the Expo Sustentat 2005 on the subject of BIO-DIESEL. According to Marcello, "we are talking about a market worth billions. Not only in liter terms, but also in financial terms!"
 

Marcello Brito (with crutches) receiving President Lula
on his visit to the Agropalma Group’s farm

In April 2005, Marcello Britto received several Government authorities, including President Lula, for the inauguration of the Agropalma Group’s bio-diesel plant. The fuel production unit will use the palm fruit as raw material.

President Lula also visited the Agropalma Group’s farm, located between the Municipalities of Moju and Tailândia, in the State of Pará, to see plantations of palm (a species of palm tree producing oil-bearing fruit) and the family farming project that is being developed in a 600-hectare area.
 
PO – Could you start this interview by explaining what bio-diesel means?

MB– Bio-diesel is the result of a reaction brought about between a vegetable or animal base, such as fat, butter, tallow or any vegetable oil, in the presence of an alcohol – which may be methanol or ethanol (methanol comes from gas, and ethanol from sugar cane, beetroot or corn) – in the presence of a catalyst, causing a reaction. As final products there will be an ester, which may be methylic ester if it is produced from methanol, or ethylic ester if it is made from ethanol, plus glycerin. This ester is the bio-diesel oil.

 

PO – I would like you to go a bit further and talk about bio-diesel as a fuel.

MB– In this case we will talk in chemical terms: it is the ethylic or methylic ester, that is, that produced by the methylic or ethylic route. Around the world, methylic type bio-diesel is the one that is most often produced. In Brazil, we are working towards using the ethylic route preferentially, although we are still producing it from methanol, as the ethylic technology is not yet 100% mastered. But we will soon get there and will have 100% sustainable bio-diesel. The alcohol to be used is from a source that is 100% renewable, which is sugar cane, rather than the gas that comes from oil extraction – methanol in Brazil – which is not sustainable because it cannot be regenerated.

 
PO – Do you think that this change will take place in the short term?
MB– In our plant, we produce it by the two routes; but, for reasons of cost, we are giving preference to methanol. The Brazilian tax structure is complicated. As we are registered as a bio-diesel producer and not as a fuel distributor, in order to buy ethylic alcohol in the market, we have to buy alcohol for other purposes in the fiscal classification. Because of that it costs us 30% more due to taxes. Still in this same law, with relation to bio-diesel production using ethanol, the final product will be bio-diesel plus hydrated alcohol. However, we cannot sell this hydrated alcohol to fuel distributors, we have to resell it to an alcohol plant. So, someone had this “brilliant” idea: you purchase ethanol, take it to your plant, use it in the process and later sell it back to the alcohol plant in the hydrated form, adding logistics costs, taxes etc. Logically, the result is not viable. This complaint has already been made in Brasilia and at almost all events at which the national bio-diesel program is discussed. The use of the ethylic route should be the great differential for Brazilian bio-diesel abroad. The attraction we want to present is a totally renewable bio-diesel oil – both the fat part and the ethanol from sugar cane.
 
PO – How long did the research phase at Agropalma last until you reached this point?
MB – When we produce palm oil, during the refining process, in fact what is used is a distillation column, in which, in the process, everything that is known as “Off flavors” is removed, that is, everything that imparts color, flavor and odor to any vegetable oil. In the distillation process, these compounds are captured in the form of fatty residues or simply fatty acids. We used to sell this residue to the soap industry which produces a cheap kind of soap in bars, with low added value. That spotty soap, very well known in the North and Northeast. This is because the product has a very strong odor and color.  
It should be stressed that the oil-based chemical industry in Brazil is still very incipient, that is, we would not have the advantage the Asians have in selling their fatty acids to the industry in general at much higher prices due to the absence of competing products, such as tallow in this country. Brazil still imports about 80% of the oil-based chemical products it consumes. Therefore, in Brazil, the price of fatty acid is fixed on average at 50% of the value of tallow, because tallow is a much better raw material for soap production.

The result is that tallow is very cheap in Brazil because the country is a large meat exporter, the largest in the world. Unfortunately, when you slaughter cattle, you produce beef plus tallow. Tallow is very cheap and automatically fatty acid is also very cheap. People who at first bought fatty acid as a substitute for tallow lost interest, because there was sufficient tallow at a low cost.
 
PO- You reached a dead end ...

MB – We had to find some solution to the problem. We could not continue as before, we could not simply throw it away somewhere.

We started developing research in order to add value to that product. A friend suggested we should talk to a chemistry professor, Donato Aranda of UFRJ (the Rio de Janeiro Federal University).  I took 1kg of the product along to Rio de Janeiro. Our conversation was excellent. The professor is an exceptional person! If Brazil had more people like Donato, we would be in a much better situation... I left the product with him. He made an assessment, studied it and, after some months, sent a report to Agropalma suggesting some alternatives, and one of them was to produce bio-diesel. That would depend on how bold we wanted to be. He had the project for the research. An innovation that did not exist anywhere else in the world and that might work.  
After a lot of talk, we decided to take on the financing of that research. We signed a contract with the University and with the Chemistry College. It was a contract with the University, not with him personally. The result of that research was the development of a new catalyst.

As you know, in order to produce bio-diesel, you need the oil, the alcohol, and a catalyst to speed up the reaction. The catalyst developed is solid and can be regenerated. This means that in our bio-diesel production process, in which the raw material is fatty acid rather than oil – thus, there is no glycerin to separate out – esterification is used, so the only by-product we have is water. The catalyst is re-used because we regenerate it.

 

PO – What year was that?

MB – All this started in 2001. The studies lasted 4 years. This catalyst is produced from niobium, by CBMM in the town of Araxá, Minas Gerais. That is, it is a catalyst made in Brazil. Until then, the other catalysts were imported from Germany.. the United States. So we had the catalyst ready, we had the process evaluated in a pilot plant, and we then filed a patent application. 

 
PO – How did the negotiation between Agropalma and Professor Donato go?
MB – The patent belongs to the Rio de Janeiro Federal University. The exclusive usage right is ours for as long as the patent is valid. We, as a private enterprise, do not want to own the patent, we want the right to use it, but to the University it is very important. We arranged things that way and pay royalties to the University. Every six months for the next twenty years, we will be paying royalties to the University, and all those who took part in the project will benefit from it.
 

PO – It is an fantastic story!... What was the next move?

MB - Well, when this part was concluded, we started to think about a way in which to make it viable, change it into an engineering project, considering it is a new technology that is not produced anywhere. We contacted several companies and liked the package offered by Dedini, which already has a lot of experience with alcohol as a bio-fuel. The greatest difficulty was that the company that agreed to develop the engineering project would have to sign a contract with Agropalma accepting our intellectual rights over the project. The company could not sell the plant in question to others without our authorization, because the development of the technology was ours. 

After negotiations, Dedini accepted this and put together a fantastic engineering package. An efficient, compact, low-cost plant was created. There is no open market for bio-diesel yet; nobody in his right mind will invest 10 to 15 million euros (that is the price for a normal bio-diesel plant in Europe). In Brazil, it’s got to be a cheaper business.  Therefore, the whole project was drawn up so that it was a feasible investment for us. And Dedini presented a project that cost less than 2 million dollars; the project is fully computerized, with every safety item you can imagine.

From the screen of a PC you can control the whole plant, producing a bio-diesel fuel that meets 100% of the European and US specifications.

 Agropalma’s bio-diesel plant

 

PO- That means you are able to export bio-diesel.

MB – Some months ago we were giving a talk on bio-diesel at the Brazil-Germany Chamber of Commerce. The last slide we showed was a comparison of the results of palm-diesel (that is what we call our bio-diesel) with the European and Brazilian norms. We are better than required in every item of the European norm, which qualifies us to sell this product abroad. In short: you have a renewable basic source – the plantation. From this plantation you extract the oil, which is then refined for the food industry; and from what is left over from the oil, you produce fuel which returns to the farm in order to fuel the equipment – and so, the cycle is closed. It was a sensational project carried out by UFRJ, the team’s professional posture was so positive that we already have other researches under way.
 
PO – You posed a challenge to them and they gave a brilliant response.
MB – They were very good and in addition, brought us new ideas. These ideas are the most extraordinary you could imagine. If one day someone asks us for organic bio-diesel, even that we are capable of supplying, since we produce organic oil. We would take this oil and first extract the glycerin from it. No one does that today because when you first extract the glycerin, what is left is fatty acid. In the near future, we’ll be able to extract organic glycerin – the only one in existence in the world – and the 90% of fatty acids will be changed into bio-diesel. A highly sustainable type of bio-diesel. It would be 100% sustainable, with a very large organic base (about 80% of organic raw material).
 
PO – Another novelty for the organic sector in 2005?
MB – We won’t produce that yet, but the project is already ready. Next year, we should be producing organic glycerin. We checked the market, with 2 companies: a German and a US company. They both accept it but they want the exclusive right to purchase the product. It would be the only organic glycerin for the cosmetics industry. What happens to normal bio-diesel? When you produce it you produce a lot of glycerin, how much of that glycerin will the market manage to absorb? Prices have fallen drastically, especially in Europe, which used to be an importer of glycerin long ago, but today is also an exporter. For that reason, we will produce a differentiated glycerin.
 
PO – What is the impact of bio-diesel on the Brazilian economy?

MB– The main problem for bio-diesel is the cost that still exists. As we are only just starting, we do not have scale production. All you have to do is to remember what it was like in the case of alcohol. At first, alcohol cost more than gasoline. The same is the case today with bio-diesel. When you do not have scale production, you have very high costs. At present, in a competitive market, it is very difficult to offer to a company like Petrobrás, Ipiranga, Texaco etc. a marvelous product, which is sustainable and ecological but which costs 70% more than ordinary diesel oil.

 
PO – And we still have to tell the consumer what bio-diesel is.
MB – The  Brazilian consumer is not prepared to pay this amount. You have to start looking for other sources in order to gain scale. In order to take the diesel oil that generates electric power to certain locations in the Amazon region, the cost of 1 liter can be equivalent to as much as 3 liters. That is, you spend the cost of 3 liters of diesel in order to take 1 liter of diesel to that region, because of the distance and logistics. Everybody deserves to have electric power.

That would be a clever way. To have regional bio-diesel production, with logistics costs dropping considerably. We should remember that it is the consumer who pays for that. Within the price of diesel oil bought in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo or anywhere else in Brazil, there is an additional amount that subsidizes the diesel which goes from one region to another.
 

PO – How do you see the relation between bio-diesel and family farming?

MB – If we create a bio-diesel program focusing only on family farming, nothing will be achieved. If we create a bio-diesel program focusing only on energy, we may achieve nothing either, because the world is not going through an energy crisis, despite the price of petroleum. Brazil is practically self-sufficient. It is not like the time when they started producing alcohol as a fuel, because then we were going through an energy crisis. We have to achieve a balance, knowing that a program the size of the Brazilian bio-diesel program cannot be created on the basis of family farm production. One can start well from there.
   

The government wants to implement bio-diesel based on castor oil in the North-east, but there are some technical restrictions.  
You will probably not be able to mix over 5% of castor-based bio-diesel into ordinary diesel oil. This is still very controversial. Castor-based bio-diesel fulfills neither European nor US norms and is very expensive.

 
We do not know who will subsidize this. You will start from a very expensive raw material in order to produce a cheap product. You can start that way at these 2%, but with the demand growing you will have to resort to soy and to palm in the Northern region. Because these are the two that will bring scale to production. Palm will bring scale, thanks to its high productivity per hectare, from 4,000 to 5,000 kg of oil per year. Soy oil productivity corresponds to that of castor, which is about 500 to 600 kg, but the volume of soy you have is huge and Brazil masters the whole cycle, contrary to castor of which we know very little. In order to gain scale and reach beyond these 2%, if we do not invest in soy and palm the program will die. We have to take advantage of this niche, this start, in order to make this investment in the North-east. Now, again, we need to know who will subsidize this program, because even if the family farmer is exempt from the PIS and COFINS contributions, according to the program, the cost will not be viable.
 
PO – Is Agropalma very involved with the family farmer?

MB – It is different in our case. As a private enterprise, our main focus is not to provide social benefits. It is the government that does that, with the taxes paid by the private sector and the taxpayer. If a private enterprise invests in partnerships involving family agriculture, it is because the program is good and is working, we make money and so does our partner. You manage to bring development to a certain region with reduced expenditure on the part of the participants involved in a project. 

At present, with these projects, a private enterprise can expand its production area without investing capital in land, without increasing personnel. (In our case, the total cost of charges and benefits is almost 102% of the salary we pay.) The farmer also gains because he can produce safely, knowing that what he produces will generate income, with guaranteed sale, technical assistance and improved income. The government will have to intervene less in the regions where these programs go ahead, reducing expenditure on minimum income programs, basic food packages etc.

In life, everything that becomes rare attracts interest. The only preserved forest in existence in our region is Agropalma’s, and if we are not careful it will soon become the target of illegal wood-cutters’ or squatters’ greed; so we decided to carry out a pilot plan with 50 family farmers in the region. Each family would receive 10 hectares and the project was divided that way. The State government supplied the land, Agropalma contributed with the production of seedlings - which take from 15 to 18 months to reach the planting stage – the initial infrastructure, assistance with technical training, first application of fertilizer, and guaranteed purchase of the produce. The price is calculated as a percentage of the value of the unprocessed oil in the European market. An exchange market that works without any interference on our part. The problem is that the palm takes from 3 to 4 years to start producing.

 
PO – How are these farmers going to live until they start producing?
MB – Hold on a minute ... That is where Banco da Amazônia, another partner, came in and provided financing for the farmers. They pay a minimum salary a month to each of these 50 families. Mind you, it is not a donation, but finance. The last partner is the Town Hall, which is responsible for selecting the families and for hiring a permanent agronomist. When they start producing and Agropalma starts to pay them for the bunches of fruit, part of this payment will be retained and deposited in a savings account in Banco da Amazônia in the name of the producer, who will not be able to touch that money. When the grace period is over, this money will be used to repay the financing of this minimum salary and the raw materials he received during those 4 years.
 
PO – A great partnership ...

MB- You have private enterprise, the state, federal and municipal governments all involved. All of them with their respective responsibilities, rights and duties under a signed contract. The producers were brought together to form an association. This was a pilot plan for 50. In the following year, we settled over 50 families, and last year another 50. We already have 1,500 hectares. The first families to be settled took such care of the plantation that production started early, almost a year before we expected.

 
PO – When do they start receiving their salaries?

MB – They have already started receiving them this year. What they received in the first 3 months of the year amounted to an average of R$800.00 each. Don’t forget that the average income in this region does not go beyond R$65.00 a month. There is no family farming program in the Northern region of Brazil that pays even half of that amount.

Don’t forget either that it is a permanent job because it is a perennial plantation, that is, it will be producing there for the next 30 years. So, for the next 30 years that person will have a job. As it is a type of plantation that does not require daily cultivation; and you can divide this area, let’s say that not all the 10 hectares are planted with palm, but 6 hectares of palm and 4 hectares of any other plantation, or fruit growing compatible with the soil, so that the farmer may have, from his own direct labor, subsistence farming as a supplement and not as an end in itself.

We are negotiating this project with the MDA (Ministry for Agrarian Development) but the bureaucratic barriers are very high.  Around Agropalma alone we have over 1,000 families settled by the INCRA, most of them in very bad conditions. This is a break with the accepted model.

 
PO - Why?

MB – Because it is said that extensive sustainable plantations are not viable in Brazil.
The proof that such a task is feasible is what we see at Agropalma. If we have corresponding support it is possible to carry out a big project involving family farmers. A big differential that producers in Europe, in the US and Canada have is knowing that they can produce because they will have assured income due to the subsidies offered.

If you make a settlement today, in Brazil, with producers planting rice, beans, corn or something else, if there is a crop failure they will have no-one to sell to nor anything to resort to. In our project, there is a strong company backing the farmers, and prepared to face the usual market tribulations.

In the State of Pará, they organized the planting of manioc for the production of starch. However, the industry was not built. The manioc is ready for the harvest. What now? What will they do with the manioc?

 
PO – That’s why it’s necessary to match supply with demand.
MB – As the governor of Pará said on the day our bio-diesel plant was inaugurated, Pará is showing a self-sustaining type of agrarian reform. It recovers a degraded area. You will never make a settlement in a forest area, because there are plenty of degraded areas.  In the case of palm plantations,  you are able to return to the soil, in terms of biomass, something like 35 tons per hectare per year. This is more biomass than any natural forest produces. Naturally, it does not have the biodiversity a forest has. You bring in an enterprise that creates green cover, inhibits leaching and erosion and protects the soil, bringing social and economic development. Agropalma’s project is open to visitation. We have visitors every week. We recently received a mission from the Thai government.  We also had visitors from Codevasf – from the São Francisco River Valley in the State of Pernambuco – coming to learn more about this model and see if it can be adapted to the São Francisco River Basin.
 
PO – Can this model be adapted to other regions?

MB – It can be adapted to a series of other crops. The thing is to break with tradition. Those involved with family farming should put ideology aside and have a nationwide project. That is, let us suppose that someone produces, someone buys and someone sells. It is a mistake to say that family farming cannot be connected with a company. On the contrary, it should be connected with a small, medium or large company.
Malaysia’s agricultural project was self supporting and grew. A country the size of the State of São Paulo – and it has more than 10 farm products of which Malaysia is among the 3 largest producers in the world. Precisely because of that, the whole agricultural part was carried out in conjunction with the industrial part. The industrial part, which adds value and sells.

We had a meeting where we were asked: What are the financing plans for bio-diesel?
Banco do Brasil has a credit line for the rural production of oil-bearing plants, aiming at bio-diesel. The people at the BNDES have a credit line for the construction of factories. What we need to know now is who will buy this product. Because today you will produce at a much higher cost than what the market is paying. Who will buy? What is the other side to this process?

 

PO How do you see the market for bio-diesel?

MB – I think it is a fantastic market. It is already a reality in Europe. There are some cases of interference that have to be evaluated: there is a huge subsidy in this sector. In Germany, but the subsidy will end in 2009. That is when we will see the final picture. When you follow the bio-diesel production cycle in Europe today, you see France doing the opposite of Germany. While Germany is a closed market (they cannot import bio-diesel), we see French investment in this area, including in Brazil, for future exports.
 
PO – Isn’t there a risk of a “bio-diesel fever?”
MB – As people talk a lot about bio-diesel,  everyone thinks it is easy to produce. Everyone wants to plant castor, palm, etc. Technically, it may even be considered easy to produce bio-diesel. But to produce bio-diesel within market specifications is very difficult and very expensive. Because it is not only the industry. You need to have the equipment for control and analysis and you must have the right logistics, which is not the same as for ordinary diesel oil. It is not simple.

We have been invited to seminars by people who want to open a business for bio-diesel production. There are even municipalities getting together to collect used frying oil in order to produce bio-diesel. What we are talking about is a 2 billion liter per year market, and people want to produce bio-diesel from collected oil? That is a very attractive project to be carried out by a company, labor cooperatives or even municipalities, if the collection is carried out in a town and if they have a partnership with a bio-diesel producer that can transform this oil and use it, for example, in the town’s own fleet. That would be a viable, sustainable program.
 
PO – You talked about the Amazon region, how do you see these declarations that have been published in the media, such as Pascal Lamy’s, for example, about the internationalization of the Amazon?

MB – If people are talking about that is because we gave them the opportunity for such talk. We are sufficiently incompetent to let all this happen. If we analyze the way in which investments were made in the Amazon, ever since the first development plan, the SPVEA, around the fifties, they all failed. One way or another, they were all radical.

If we take the SUDAM (Amazon Development Superintendency) plan, at the time of the seventies and eighties, we see that it was an absurd plan, because the government gave subsidies for people and companies to clear as much as possible of the forest. At that time, as there was no ecological thinking, they all went to the Amazon region, both national and international companies. The concept at that time was different. Until there came a time when people realized that model would not work. Those who invested in something that could be sustainable, remained there. Those who didn’t, left. All you have to do is to look at the investments that were made there and see how many remained. Even today there is no adequate control in the Amazon region because the main economic activities related to the forest are in the hands of politicians or people who are connected with them in some way.

 
PO – Isn’t there any government initiative to establish control? Could you explain a little more about Provisional Measure 2166?
MB – P.M. 2166 is the 80/20 law. The Amazon region is so important to Brazil that a provisional measure that affects an area that is over 50% of the Brazilian territory has continued as a provisional measure since 1999. It has not been discussed since then, at least the way it should be. If it was considered important it would have been discussed. But no one wants to take on that responsibility.

It so happens that the laws for the Amazon region started to be improved during the Sarney administration, when he took away the subsidies for deforestation. That was an important measure. In 1999, the 80/20 law was created. Do you know any private enterprise interested in getting to a forest area and clearing 80% of the trees in order to plant? You won’t find one because the company would not sell this product anywhere. The concept today is different. Whether you are a conscientious entrepreneur or not, the pressures, whether national or international, are growing – especially on the part of clients – and no one, that is, no serious-minded person, wishes to clear the forest any more.

On the other hand, if you have an area that was cleared years and years ago, and that has been abandoned, that does not produce any kind of wealth nor income and has zero environmental value, and if you wish to invest in that area, the law says that you can use 20% of that land, the other 80% must be re-forested, on the entrepreneur’s own account and risk, and he also has to pay taxes on 100% of that area. For example, if any one invades that area, and fells the forest you yourself planted, you are judicially penalized, you will be arrested.
Because, according to the law, you are obliged to protect that land, which should be the government’s responsibility as you cannot invest in such land. They have created a law in Brazil that says: “For the benefit of the world community, all those who own land in the Brazilian Amazon region will have to give up 80% of their land without anything in return”. Brazil says that we will take 80% of the Brazilian Amazon region and donate that area for the well-being of the international community, forgetting that we have over 20 million people living in that region, and who, like any other citizen of the world, also want and deserve to aim for the comfort of a better and more dignified life.
 
PO -  What is the solution?
MB – The thing is, you have the opposing camps: radical environmentalists who forget about external economic factors, and radical economists who forget about external environmental factors, and so, things don’t move. The happy medium does exist and has to be put into practice. The government must fulfill its obligation to legislate.
 
PO – And what about the extractive activity?
MB – The extractive activity is excellent in order to feed 50 families, but not for the number of people who live in the Amazon region.

In fact, it is necessary to have balance, and understand that as you develop the region in a sustainable way you are inhibiting depredation. When destruction is illegal, then it is a case for the police. We have the SIVAN system, we have satellites over the Amazon, in short, we have every resource needed to control the destruction.  What is missing is the political will.

 

PO – With all this international pressure, aren’t you afraid that it may come to a point where this negative image of deforestation affects products coming from the Amazon region?

MB – Exactly. And that is why we have to break with tradition. We must have a law, a social, economical and environmental development policy, that shows that it can be different. Agropalma is proof of that. We are in the middle of the Amazon region, inside a poor region, producing wealth in a sustainable way.

Did we make any mistake in the past? Of course we did. Everybody did. Wrong for today’s way of thinking. It wasn’t in the past. The human being’s great advantage in any business is that you can adapt to the needs of the time in which you live. Our need today is sustainability, and we are showing that it is feasible. We invite you to visit us to learn about the structure and see what is taking place, talk to the people employed, and see the number of micro-entrepreneurs that have already arisen in the region. We then travel about 30 km in order to see the local situation in the surrounding areas, and we will see a lot of poverty – extreme poverty – ignorance, illiteracy and high infant mortality rates.

We have been producing in very large quantities because we have sunshine, the right climate, water the whole year round. On the one hand, we celebrate the success of our agricultural industry, but on the other, we are criticized sometimes without any foundation. People say that the State of Mato Grosso is the largest agent for the destruction of the Amazon forest. If I’m not mistaken, the State of Mato Grosso has 90 million hectares and has 2 or 3  or even 6 million hectares of soy plantations – that is, less than 10% of its area. So the truth is relative. It depends on the way it is shown. The media exploit the subject according to their own interests. 
PO – What’s your view of the issue of carbon credits in relation to this reforestation?
MB- In this respect, the forests validated in carbon sequestration plans are those planted after the year 2000. This is a point that is favorable to the Brazilian government, the big project that we have to do, it’s a big reforestation program in the degraded areas, in which, in addition to the ecological and economic gain from the fruits of this production, there will be the gain from carbon sequestration. The amount of planted forests in Brazil is still very small.

So carbon sequestration is another opportunity for Brazil to do something potentially big in environmental terms. If we take our industrial emissions, added to the burning of forest and brush for clearing purposes and other things, Brazil would not be a beneficiary. We are only benefiting now because we are still considered a developing country. This is the moment. We have to take advantage now. We should add things up, we should add carbon sequestration with the use of bio-diesel to substitute fossil or renewable fuels. It is an additional gain
 
PO- Do you consider this a strategic moment for Brazil?
MB – All of this is a matter of “strategic intelligence”. What was missing in Brazil in the past, and what is encouraging all this destruction in the Amazon region, was the lack of strategic intelligence.   Brazil is suffering. If nothing is done and we leave things the way they are, it will be another generation that’s wasted.  All perennial plantations are long-term, and  by time you raise seedlings, plant them and wait till they reach maturity, another 10, 12 years have gone by.  Each government that takes office and does nothing, lets things go on the same way, is in fact helping to make matters worse. During the second mandate of the last government, when the 80/20 Law was passed, in 99, nothing was done. During the present administration also, nothing has been discussed in this respect. If they have the intelligence to transform what does harm into a beneficial project, that would be ideal. Leaving things as they are is complicated, and creating a whole lot of forest reserves just to bow to international pressure, doesn’t help at all. You create a reserve but you don’t create the means of sustaining it.
 
PO – You said that there’s an enormous market for bio-diesel. What size is it?
MB – Brazil’s present program says 2% of bio-diesel is to be added to ordinary diesel oil. From 2008 on it will be compulsory – for the time being it’s voluntary. After it becomes compulsory, we’re dealing with a market that will have to produce about 1 billion liters per year. If we place it at  R$1.40 per liter, you can see that it’s a considerable market. And that’s with just 2%.When it becomes compulsory to use 5%, it will be even bigger. That’s with regard to Brazil. In Europe, in 2008 it will become compulsory to use 5.75% of bio-diesel in ordinary diesel oil. So we’re talking about a market worth billions. Not just in liter terms, but in financial terms!
 


 

http://www.agropalma.com.br/


 

 

© 2000-2005 Programação Visual 2A2. Todos os direitos reservados.
Termo de Uso  |  Política de Privacidade